






I’ve been less than happy with the direction that Wizards has taken for Dungeons & Dragons. One small example is their horrible communication. As s DDI member on the Community site today I received an email with the subject of “New Broadcast”:
You have a new broadcast on your site at The Wizards Community!
WotC_Trevor from the group D&D Insider has sent you a broadcast.
Subject: Content Calendar and Article NewsMore information and discussion on the Content Calendar Changes can be found here. Also, Steve Winter talks about the new vetting process and for Dung…
To view the entire broadcast click here
So instead of sending me the broadcast message, I get a truncated notice that I should read a the new broadcast message on the Community site. So, so wrong — even Facebook sends you the entire message and includes the sender in the subject. So next I click the “click here” to be taken to the broadcast message and instead of being the content that I would care about, I get:
More information and discussion on the Content Calendar Changes can be found here. Also, Steve Winter talks about the new vetting process and for Dungeon and Dragon content and recent article delays in his blog.
You have to be kidding me. So not only does the email you sent me not have the interesting content, the email just links to a page that has a couple links where the interesting content was posted to the forums and a blog (which at least can now be followed via RSS).
You shouldn’t force your customers to read an email and then visit three web pages just to get some important information.
















The movie Avatar is coming out

















(5) We are being asked by the truthers to believe that the 19 hijackers were “patsies”, or non-existent. If that was the case, and if the intention of the real plotters in the US government was to justify military interventions to overthrow hostile regimes in the Middle East, why were 15 out of the 19 ‘bogus’ Al Qaeda terrorists given Saudi nationality? The other four hijackers consisted of an Egyptian, a Lebanese and two citizens of the UAE. We are being asked to believe that the conspirators behind 9/11 decided that they would make the hijackers citizens of allies of the USA, not enemies. Why were they not given Iraqi, Iranian or Syrian identity? Why were they not given forged links with terrorist groups (such as the Abu Nidal Organisation, the PLFP-GC or Hizbollah) with closer links to Tehran, Damascus and above all Baghdad? If we are supposed to believe that the Israelis had a hand in 9/11, then why were none of the patsies Palestinians linked to Fatah or Hamas? What kind of conspirator sets up a plot to frame an innocent party without forging the evidence to implicate the latter?










